This study focuses on ‘crisis memory,’ which is the way people recall and reconstruct past crises when facing a similar new crisis.
It examines how SARS was discussed onChinese social media (Weibo) during COVID-19 and how these discussions shaped public perceptions of the crisis and the organizations handling it.
People naturally look to past experiences when responding to new crises.
Organizations with a history of crises may suffer greater reputational damage, amplified by social media.
Understanding crisis memory can help improve crisis communication, build public trust, and encourage cooperation.
This study examines how the public reconstructs past crises and their effects on organizational reputation and public perception.
Organizations need to recognize and engage with crisis memory. If people are recalling a past crisis, organizations should proactively address it rather than ignoring it.
Historical references can help people feel more in control by using past lessons to guide behavior.
Organizations can use positive crisis memory (like heroism and history) to build trust and encourage safety behaviors.
Over-relying on hero stories might backfire—if people think "the heroes will handle it," they may not take action themselves.
Nationalism narratives might reduce fear, but they shouldn’t overshadow real risks.
Criticism is inevitable—organizations should respond constructively rather than defensively.
If an organization has faced similar crises in the past, people are more likely to assign blame and trust it less. This "crisis memory" shapes the public's perception of the organization's responsibility and reputation.
People rely on past crises to determine who is to blame in a new situation. Strong emotions, such as anger or fear, from previous events influence how they react.
Organizations can leverage positive memories, such as heroic efforts, to rebuild trust. However, if past failures are left unaddressed, negative memories can damage their reputation.
This study reinforces social constructionism—crises aren’t simply objective events; they are shaped by how people remember and discuss them.
How can organizations talk about past crises in a way that keeps people’s trust during a new crisis?
Do you think these findings apply to companies facing a crisis (like a product recall) or just to health crises?
If this study were done in the U.S. instead of China, do you think the results would be the same? Why or why not?
What other factors do you think could change how people remember and talk about past crises (for example, news coverage, age, or personal experience)?
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.